Global Tariff Uncertainty Sidelines Buyers

Canadian existing home sales were unchanged last month as tariff concerns again mothballed home-buying intentions, mainly in the GTA and GVA where sales have declined for months. Consumer confidence has fallen to rock-bottom levels as many fear the prospect of job losses and higher prices.

The number of sales recorded over Canadian MLS® Systems was unchanged (-0.1%) between March and April 2025, marking a pause in the trend of declining activity since the beginning of the year. (Chart A)

Demand is currently hovering around levels seen during the second half of 2022, and the first and third quarters of 2023.

“At this point, the 2025 Canadian housing story would best be described as a return to the quiet markets we’ve experienced since 2022, with tariff uncertainty taking the place of high interest rates in keeping buyers on the sidelines,” said Shaun Cathcart, CREA’s Senior Economist. “Given the increasing potential for a rough economic patch ahead, the risk going forward will be if an average number of people trying to sell their homes turns into a large number of people who have to sell their homes, and that’s something we have not seen in decades.”

New Listings

New supply declined by 1% month-over-month in April. Combined with flat sales, the national sales-to-new listings ratio climbed to 46.8% compared to 46.4% in March. The long-term average for the national sales-to-new listings ratio is 54.9%, with readings between 45% and 65% generally consistent with balanced housing market conditions.

At the end of April 2025, 183,000 properties were listed for sale on all Canadian MLS® Systems, up 14.3% from a year earlier but still below the long-term average of around 201,000 listings for that time of the year.

“The number of homes for sale across Canada has almost returned to normal, but that is the result of higher inventories in B.C. and Ontario, and tight inventories everywhere else,” said Valérie Paquin, CREA Chair.

There were 5.1 months of inventory on a national basis at the end of April 2025, which is in line with the long-term average of five months. Based on one standard deviation above and below that long-term average, a seller’s market would be below 3.6 months and a buyer’s market above 6.4 months.

Home Prices

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) declined 1.2% from March to April 2025. The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 3.6% compared to March 2024.

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) declined 1.2% from March to April 2025. The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 3.6% compared to March 2024.

Bottom Line

Before the tariff threats emerged, the housing market was poised for a strong rebound as the spring selling season approached.

Unfortunately, the situation has only deteriorated as business and consumer confidence have fallen sharply. While the first-round effect of tariffs is higher prices as importers attempt to pass off the higher costs to consumers, second-round effects slow economic activity, reflecting layoffs and business and household belt-tightening.

The Bank of Canada refrained from cutting the overnight policy rate for fear of tariff-related price hikes. Since then, Canadian labour markets have softened, and preliminary evidence suggests that economic activity will weaken further in recent months, despite a rollback in tariffs with China, at least temporarily.

While homebuyers are leery, real housing bargains are increasingly prevalent as supplies rise and home prices fall. Sellers are increasingly motivated to make deals, and pent-up demand is growing. Outside of the GTA and GVA, sales have remained positive.

We expect the Bank of Canada to cut the overnight rate again on June 4 as long as next week’s April inflation data are reasonably well behaved, which should be the case given the sharp fall in energy prices.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Manufacturing Employment Plunged as Tariffs Weakened the Economy

Today’s Labour Force Survey for April showed a marked adverse impact of tariffs on the Canadian economy. Early evidence suggests that the slowing economy will be the primary fallout of tariffs, with upward pressure on prices a secondary impact. The central bank’s actions will mitigate inflation while gradually lowering interest rates. Today’s weak report sets the stage for a 25 bps rate cut on the June 4th decision date.

Overall employment changed little in April (+7,400; +0.0%), following a decline in March (-33,000; -0.2%) and virtually no change in February.

Following a decline of 0.2 percentage points in March, the employment rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older—fell a further 0.1 percentage points in April. This increased the employment rate to 60.8%, matching a recent low in October 2024.

The employment rate trended down for most of 2023 and 2024, as population growth outpaced employment gains. More recently, it increased for three consecutive months from November 2024 to January 2025, driven by strong employment gains amid slower population growth.

Public sector employment increased by 23,000 (+0.5%) in April, following three consecutive months of little change. This growth was associated with temporary hiring for the federal election.

The number of private-sector employees was little changed in April, following a decline in March (-48,000; -0.3%). Self-employment was little changed for a third consecutive month in April.

The unemployment rate rose 0.2 percentage points to 6.9% in April, following an increase of 0.1 percentage points in March. With these increases, the unemployment rate has returned to its level of November 2024, which was the highest since January 2017 (excluding the years 2020 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic).

The number of unemployed people—those looking for work or on temporary layoff—increased by 39,000 (+2.6%) in April and was up by 189,000 (+13.9%) year over year.
Unemployed people faced more difficulties finding work in April than a year earlier. Among those unemployed in March, 61.0% remained unemployed in April, higher than the corresponding proportion for the same months in 2024 (57.3%) (not seasonally adjusted).

The share of workers being laid off may increase during periods of economic downturn or disruption. Among those employed in March 2025, 0.7% had become unemployed in April due to a layoff. This proportion changed little from the same period in 2024 (0.6%) (not seasonally adjusted).

There were more people in the labour force in April, and the participation rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older who were employed or looking for work—increased by 0.1 percentage points to 65.3%. Despite the increase in the month, the participation rate was down 0.4 percentage points on a year-over-year basis.

Total hours worked increased 0.4% in April and were up 0.9% compared with 12 months earlier.

Average hourly wages among employees increased 3.4% (+$1.20 to $36.13) year-over-year in April, following growth of 3.6% in March (not seasonally adjusted).

Employment fell in manufacturing (-31,000; -1.6%) in April, as the industry continues to face uncertainty related to tariffs on exports to the United States. Ontario posted the most significant decline (-33,000; -3.9%) in this industry among the provinces. This was the first significant decline for manufacturing employment at the national level since November 2024. Despite the decrease in the month, employment in manufacturing changed little on a year-over-year basis in April.

Wholesale and retail trade employment declined by 27,000 (-0.9%) in April, following a similarly sized decline in March (-29,000; -1.0%). The decline over the two months offset the substantial gain recorded in February. On a year-over-year basis, wholesale and retail trade employment changed little in April.

Chart 3 – Employment down in manufacturing in April

Employment rose in public administration (+37,000; +3.0%) in April, the first significant increase for the sector since July 2024. The increase was mostly in temporary work and coincided with activities associated with the federal election. Advanced polling took place from April 18 to April 21 and the election was held on April 28. The Labour Force Survey (LFS) reference week was April 13 to April 19.

In finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing, employment increased by 24,000 (+1.6%) in April, continuing an upward trend from October 2024, with cumulative gains during this period totalling 67,000 (+4.7%).

Bottom Line

Statistics Canada assessed the proportion of employees anticipating layoffs. Not surprisingly, employees in industries dependent on US demand for Canadian exports were more likely to anticipate layoffs. Job insecurity causes people to tighten their belts.

April is the third month in a row that the Canadian economy has seen very little change in employment or job losses, underscoring a slowdown in hiring or downsizing amid trade uncertainty. It’s also the first month that the tariff impact on export-dependent jobs in auto, steel, aluminum, and other sectors becomes more evident.

Ontario, the country’s factory heartland, saw the steepest plunge in this industry among the provinces. In Windsor, the auto industry hub, the unemployment rate jumped 1.4 percentage points to 10.7%, the highest among 20 of Canada’s largest metropolitan areas.

Traders in overnight swaps upped their bets for a rate cut at the Bank of Canada’s next decision on June 4, putting the odds at just over a coin flip after the release.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Bank of Canada Holds Rates Steady In The Face Of Tariff Uncertainty–More Rate Cuts Coming

The Bank of Canada held its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 2.75% at today’s meeting, as expected by half of the market, to mark the first hold following 225 basis points of cuts in seven consecutive decisions. The governing council noted that the unpredictability of the magnitude and duration of tariffs posed downside risks to growth and lifted inflation expectations, warranting caution regarding the continuation of monetary easing.

The higher uncertainty stemmed from the United States’ lack of a clear tariff path, prompting the BoC Governing Council to present two economic scenarios in its latest Monetary Policy Report. Should the US limit the scope of its tariffs on Canada, the BoC expects growth to temporarily weaken and inflation to hold near the 2% target. Should the US proceed with an all-out trade war with Canada and China, the BoC has pencilled in a recession this year, and inflation rising temporarily above 3% next year.

Of course, as the Bank stated in its press release, “Many other trade policy scenarios are possible. There is also an unusual degree of uncertainty about the economic outcomes within any scenario, since the magnitude and speed of the shift in US trade policy are unprecedented.”

The statement says, “Serial tariff announcements, postponements, and continued threats of escalation have roiled financial markets. This extreme market volatility is adding to uncertainty. Oil prices have declined substantially since January, mainly reflecting weaker prospects for global growth. Canada’s exchange rate has recently appreciated as a result of broad US dollar weakness.”

The Bank says in these very unusual times, “In Canada, the economy is slowing as tariff announcements and uncertainty pull down consumer and business confidence. Consumption, residential investment and business spending all look to have weakened in the first quarter. Trade tensions are also disrupting recovery in the labour market. Employment declined in March and businesses are reporting plans to slow their hiring. Wage growth continues to show signs of moderation.

Inflation was 2.3% in March, lower than in February but still higher than 1.8% at the time of the January Monetary Policy Report (MPR). The higher inflation in the last couple of months reflects some rebound in goods price inflation and the end of the temporary suspension of the GST/HST. Starting in April, CPI inflation will be pulled down for one year by the removal of the consumer carbon tax. Lower global oil prices will also dampen inflation in the near term. However, we expect tariffs and supply chain disruptions to push up some prices. How much upward pressure this puts on inflation will depend on the evolution of tariffs and how quickly businesses pass on higher costs to consumers. Short-term inflation expectations have moved up, as businesses and consumers anticipate higher costs from trade conflict and supply disruptions. Longer-term inflation expectations are little changed.

Governing Council will continue to assess the timing and strength of both the downward pressures on inflation from a weaker economy and the upward pressures on inflation from higher costs. Our focus will be on ensuring Canadians continue to have confidence in price stability through this period of global upheaval. This means we will support economic growth while ensuring that inflation remains well-controlled.

The Governing Council will proceed carefully, paying particular attention to the risks and uncertainties facing the Canadian economy. These include the extent to which higher tariffs reduce demand for Canadian exports, how much this spills over into business investment, employment, and household spending, how much and how quickly cost increases are passed on to consumer prices, and how inflation expectations evolve.

Monetary policy cannot resolve trade uncertainty or offset the impacts of a trade war. What it can and must do is maintain price stability for Canadians.”

Bottom Line

The US is determined to impose worldwide tariffs, disproportionately hitting Canada, Mexico, and China, the US’s top trading partners. This is a misguided neo-Mercantilist policy. Mercantilism assumes that the global economic pie is fixed, so if one country prospers, another must fail. This idea of a zero-sum game was debunked in the 18th century by Adam Smith and others who showed that if countries have a competitive advantage in various products and services, all are better off by producing and trading those products with the rest of the world. It is not a zero-sum game. The economic pie grows with trade. This was the idea behind globalization and the USMCA free trade agreement.

Given Canada’s vulnerability to tariffs, the economy will suffer more than the US, which has a relatively closed economy (where exports are a small proportion of GDP). Prices will rise depending on the duration and size of the coming tariffs, but mitigating the inflation will be the weakness in economic activity. Stagflation, a buzzword from the 1970s, is back in the lexicon.

We expect the BoC to resume cutting the policy rate in 25-bps increments until it reaches 2.0%-to-2.25% this summer, triggering a rebound in home sales. Layoffs and spending cuts will dampen sentiment, but lower interest rates will bring buyers off the sidelines. Housing inventories have risen sharply with new condo supply and a marked rise in the new listings of existing homes, and home prices are falling.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Global Tariff Uncertainty Sidelines Buyers

Canadian existing home sales plunged last month as tariff concerns again mothballed home-buying intentions. Consumer confidence has fallen to rock-bottom levels as many fear the prospect of job losses and higher prices.

According to data released today by the Canadian Real Estate Association, existing home sales declined by 4.8% month-over-month. Along with declines in the three previous months, national home sales are now down 20% from their recent high recorded last November.

“Up until this point, declining home sales have mostly been about tariff uncertainty. Going forward, the Canadian housing space will also have to contend with the actual economic fallout. In short order we’ve gone from a slam dunk rebound year to treading water at best,” said Shaun Cathcart, CREA’s Senior Economist.

While the largest of these declines has been seen in Ontario and British Columbia, sales have been down over the last few months in all but a handful of small markets across the country.

On a non-seasonally adjusted basis, the overall Canadian sales total for March 2025 fell 9.3% year-over-year and was the lowest for that month since 2009.

New Listings

New supply moved up by 3% month-over-month in March. Combined with the decrease in sales, the national sales-to-new listings ratio fell to 45.9% compared to 49.7% in February. The March level for this measure of market balance is the lowest since February 2009. The long-term average for the national sales-to-new listings ratio is 54.9%, with readings between 45% and 65% generally consistent with balanced housing market conditions.

At the end of March 2025, 165,800 properties were listed for sale on all Canadian MLS® Systems, up 18.3% from a year earlier but still below the long-term average (around 174,000 listings) for this time of year.

“While the trend of falling monthly sales has been observed across Canada over the last few months, there are still many regions where sales are high, inventory is near record lows, and prices are rising,” said Valérie Paquin, newly installed Chair of CREA’s 2025-2026 Board of Directors. “There are also parts of the country with historically low sales and the highest inventory levels in a decade or more.”

At the end of March 2025, there were 5.1 months of inventory nationwide, the highest level since the early months of the pandemic. The long-term average for this measure is five months of inventory.

Home Prices

The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) declined by 1% from February to March 2025, marking the largest month-over-month decrease since November 2023.

The renewed price softening was most notable in British Columbia and Ontario’s Greater Golden Horseshoe. Prices have continued to push higher across much of the Prairies, Quebec, and the East Coast.

The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 2.1% compared to March 2024.

The non-seasonally adjusted national average home price was $678,331 in March 2025, down 3.7% from March 2024.

Bottom Line

Before the tariff threats emerged, the housing market was poised for a strong rebound as the spring selling season approached.

Unfortunately, the situation has only deteriorated as business and consumer confidence have fallenen sharply. While the first-round effect of tariffs is higher prices as importers attempt to pass off the higher costs to consumers, second-round effects slow economic activity, reflecting layoffs and business and household belt-tightening.

The Bank of Canada will undoubtedly come to the rescue this year by further slashing interest rates. This is particularly important for Canada, where interest-rate sensitivity is far higher than in the US. But traders are betting that the odds of another 25 bps rate cut tomorrow are no better than even.

The economy is slowing, and inflation fell more than expected in March. Next month’s inflation data are also likely to improve, reflecting the elimination of the carbon tax. This keeps the possibility of an April rate cut open, but even if the Bank of Canada takes a pass this month, we estimate they will cut the overnight rate three more times this year, taking it down 300 bps from its peak last year. This will finally spur buyers off the sidelines, but the timing of this rebound is more uncertain than usual, given the chaos in the White House.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Weaker Than Expected Inflation May Not Be Enough to Trigger Another Bank of Canada Rate Cut Tomorrow

Canadian consumer prices rose 0.3% in March (or remained flat when seasonally adjusted), which was lower than expected, reducing the annual inflation rate by 0.3 percentage points to 2.3%. This decrease in headline inflation followed the complete removal of the GST holiday in March.

There was a significant drop in travel tour prices and airfares compared to the previous year, as Canadians reduced their travel to the U.S. during peak times. Additionally, gasoline prices fell by a modest 1.8%, with further declines expected in April, likely bringing the headline inflation rate below 2%.

The core measures largely met expectations last month, with the trimmed rate decreasing moderately to 2.8% and the median rate holding steady at 2.9% year-over-year. Although these annual numbers remain high, the monthly results were more encouraging, increasing by just 0.1% month-over-month on a seasonally adjusted basis. Moreover, their three-month trend eased to below 3%.

Prices excluding food and energy dipped slightly, reducing the traditional measure of core inflation to 2.4% from 2.9%. Travel tour costs dropped 8% month-over-month (or 4.7% year-over-year), and airfares fell 12% year-over-year. Cellphone service costs also decreased by 7% year-over-year. March saw the beginning of some Canadian counter-tariffs, leading to price increases in areas like sporting equipment, which rose 12.2% year-over-year. However, declines in travel and gasoline costs overshadowed these price upticks.

Shelter costs also showed signs of easing—rents slowed to 5.1% year-over-year from 5.8%, and mortgage interest costs reduced to 7.9% from 9.0%.

Bottom Line

This report will reinforce the Bank of Canada’s cautious stance on easing to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Canada experienced a break in rising inflation in March due to lower travel costs. The inflation impact of the trade war differs for Canada compared to the U.S., as Canadian tariffs are lighter, and the domestic economy is under more significant pressure.

The strengthening Canadian dollar helps reduce import prices, addressing one of the Bank of Canada’s inflation concerns. Gasoline prices fell sharply on April 1 following the removal of the carbon tax. They continued to decline due to dropping global oil prices, which may lead to a significant decrease in headline inflation next month. Despite these conditions potentially signalling a favourable situation for the BoC to cut rates, core inflation measures are still close to 3%, and ongoing trade war dynamics complicate policymaking decisions.

The odds of a ninth rate cut tomorrow are about even. Recent reports suggest that business and consumer confidence has deteriorated and that spending is slowing. Nevertheless, the central bank remains concerned about the inflationary impact of tariffs.

Even if the Bank does not cut rates in April, we will likely see three more 25-basis-point cuts this year, bringing the overnight rate down to 2.0%—300 bps lower than its peak last year.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Weak Canadian Job Creation Is The First Fallout From The Trade War

Today’s Labour Force Survey for March was weaker than expected. Employment decreased by 33,000 (-0.2%) in March, the first decrease since January 2022. The decline in March followed little change in February and three consecutive months of growth in November, December and January, totalling 211,000 (+1.0%).

The employment rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older—fell 0.2 percentage points to 60.9% in March. This partially offsets an increase of 0.3 percentage points observed from October 2024 to January 2025.

Private sector employment fell by 48,000 (-0.3 %) in March, following little change in February and a cumulative increase of 97,000 (+0.7%) from November 2024 to January 2025. On a year-over-year basis, the number of employees in the private sector was up by 175,000 (+1.3%).

Public sector employment was little changed for a third consecutive month in March, up 92,000 (+2.1%) compared with a year earlier. Self-employment was also little changed in March, up 81,000 (+3.0%) on a year-over-year basis.

Economists expected the trade war to weigh on the Canadian labour market in March. Market participants expected zero employment gains as steel & aluminum tariffs hit jobs in the sector. While we haven’t seen broad-based layoffs yet, automaker Stellantis NV temporarily halted production at assembly plants in Windsor, ON and Mexico, laying off 3,200 people in Canada, 2,600 in Mexico and 900 at six U.S. factories. The pressure from those and broader non-USMCA-compliant tariffs was expected to drive stagnant job growth in the month. At 6.7%, the jobless rate met expectations, still two ticks shy of November’s cycle high.

Employment could experience a further downside over the coming months, depending on how the tariff backdrop evolves. Average hours worked could see an even bigger hit as work-sharing programs come into effect due to pressure on manufacturing production.

The unemployment rate rose 0.1 percentage points to 6.7% in March, the first increase since November 2024. It had trended up from 5.0% in March 2023 to a recent high of 6.9% in November 2024 before falling by 0.3 percentage points from November 2024 to January 2025 in the context of robust employment growth at the end of 2024 and in early 2025.

Since March 2024, the unemployment rate has remained above its pre-COVID-19 pandemic average of 6.0% (from 2017 to 2019).

In total, 1.5 million people were unemployed in March, up 36,000 (+2.5%) in the month and up 167,000 (+12.4%) year over year.

Among those unemployed in February, 14.7% became employed in March. This was lower than the corresponding proportion in March 2024 (18.6%) (not seasonally adjusted).

Long-term unemployment has also risen; the proportion of unemployed people searching for work for 27 weeks or more stood at 23.7% in March 2025, up from 18.3% in March 2024.

Total hours worked rose 0.4% in March, following a decline of 1.3% in February. On a year-over-year basis, total hours worked were up 1.2%.

Average hourly wages among employees were up 3.6% (+$1.24 to $36.05) year over year in March, following growth of 3.8% in February (not seasonally adjusted).

Wholesale and retail trade employment fell by 29,000 (-1.0 %) in March, partly offsetting an increase of 51,000 in February. On a year-over-year basis, the number of people working in wholesale and retail trade was little changed in March.

Employment declines led by wholesale and retail trade in March

Following five months of little change, employment in information, culture, and recreation decreased by 20,000 (-2.4%) in March. Despite the decline, employment in this industry changed little on a year-over-year basis.

In March, employment also fell in agriculture (-9,300; -3.9%), while there were gains in “other services” (such as personal and repair services) (+12,000; +1.5%) and in utilities (+4,200; +2.8%).

Bottom Line

US employment data for March were also released this morning. In direct contrast to Canada, US job growth beat forecasts in March, and the unemployment rate edged up, pointing to a healthy labour market before the global economy gets hit by widespread tariffs.

Canada’s job market stalled in March, shedding the most jobs in over three years. The job loss was the first in eight months, with trade-exposed sectors driving some declines.

The threats and implementation of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs and Canada’s retaliating levies have weighed on the Canadian jobs market over the past two months. However, with the country dodging the latest round of so-called reciprocal tariffs this week, the Bank of Canada may have more time to weigh economic weakness against rising price pressures.

Stocks have fallen the most since March 2020–the beginning of Covid, and bonds are rallying causing market-driven interest rates to drop precipitously. The Bank of Canada meets again on April 16. The day before, Canadian inflation data for March will be released. This will be a crucial report as the central bank assesses the tug-of-war between tariff-induced inflation and unemployment. Currently, traders are betting there is only a 33% chance of a 25 bps rate cut later this month. While the BoC might take a pass this month, the coming slowdown in the Canadian economy will warrant rate cuts in June, if not sooner.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Canadian Inflation Surged to 2.6% in February, Much Stronger Than Expected

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 2.6% year-over-year (y/y) in February, following an increase of 1.9% in January. With the federal tax break ending on February 15, the GST and HST were reapplied to eligible products. This put upward pressure on consumer prices for those items, as taxes paid by consumers are included in the CPI.

While the second straight acceleration in the headline number was expected, the pace of price gains may still surprise Bank of Canada policymakers, who cut interest rates for the seventh straight meeting. Donald Trump’s tariff threats hamper business and consumer spending. But assuming the federal sales tax break hadn’t been in place, Canadian inflation would have jumped even higher to 3% in February. This is at the upper bound of the bank’s target range, from 2.7% a month earlier. Canadian inflation has not been at or above 3% since the end of 2023.

Faster price growth was broad-based in February, the end of the goods and services tax (GST)/harmonized sales tax (HST) break through the month contributed notable upward pressure to prices for eligible products. Slower growth for gasoline prices (+5.1%) moderated the all-items CPI acceleration.

The CPI rose 1.1% m/m in February and 0.7% on a seasonally adjusted basis.  However, the increase exceeded the tax impact as seasonally-adjusted CPI excluding the tax impact was +0.4%. And, in case you want to pin it on food & energy, CPI excluding food, energy & taxes was +0.3%.

Gains were across the board, with the sectors impacted by the tax change seeing the most significant increase: recreation +3.4%, food +1.9%, clothing +1.6%, and alcohol +1.5% more to come next month, with the tax holiday only ending in mid-February. The headline inflation figures are subject to as much noise as we’ve seen in decades. They are poised to continue for at least another couple of months, making it very challenging to interpret the inflation data.

As a result, prices for food purchased from restaurants declined at a slower pace year over year in February (-1.4%) compared with January (-5.1%). Restaurant food prices contributed the most to the acceleration in the all-items CPI in February.

Similarly, on a yearly basis, alcoholic beverages purchased from stores declined 1.4% in February, following a 3.6% decline in January.

On a year-over-year basis, gasoline prices decelerated, with a 5.1% increase in February following an 8.6% gain in January. Prices rose less month over month in February 2025 compared with February 2024, when higher global crude oil prices pushed up gasoline prices, leading to slower year-over-year price growth in February 2025.

Month over month, gasoline prices rose 0.6% in February. This increase was primarily related to higher refining costs amid planned refinery maintenance across North America. This offset lower crude oil prices, mainly due to increased American supply and tariff threats, contributing to slowing global growth concerns.

One notable exception to the broad-based strength was shelter, rising “just” 0.2%. That’s the smallest gain in five months, trimming the yearly pace to 4.2%, the slowest since 2021, with more downside to come. Mortgage interest costs rose a modest 0.2% for a second straight month, slicing it to +9% y/y, ending a 2½-year run of double-digit increases.

Not surprisingly, the core inflation metrics were firm as well. CPI-Trim and Median both rose 0.3% m/m and 2.9% y/y. The 3- and 6-month annualized rates are all above 3% as well, pointing to ongoing stickiness. The breadth of inflation, which has been a focus for the Bank of Canada, also worsened with the share of items rising 3%+ increasing modestly. None of this is encouraging news for policymakers.

Bottom Line

This report will reinforce the Bank of Canada’s cautious stance on easing to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Notably, the upcoming end of the carbon tax will cause inflation to drop sharply in April. However, March may see an increase in inflation as the effects of the tax holiday begin to reverse. There is still a lot of uncertainty surrounding inflation, which complicates the job of policymakers. We will see what April 2 brings regarding additional tariffs.

If the economic outlook did not worsen, the Bank of Canada might consider pausing after cutting rates at seven consecutive meetings. However, the Canadian economy will likely slow significantly in the coming months.

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said last week the bank would “”roceed carefully””amid the tariff war. Economists are still awaiting more clarity on tariffs before firming up their expectations for the next rate decision on April 16, when policymakers will also update their forecasts. Right now, traders are betting that the BoC will hold rates steady in April, but a lot can and will happen before then.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

Shakespeare might have thought ‘to be or not to be’ was the ultimate question, but he wasn’t living in 2025 trying to minimize bank fees and interest charges while maximizing financial returns—and having to pay $9 for a clamshell of raspberries. This month, we’re tackling a modern dilemma: ‘Should I get a variable or fixed rate on my mortgage?’ Not as poetic, but way more practical. Let’s dive in.

Understanding the Basics: Every mortgage payment has two components: principal and interest. Your choice between a fixed or variable mortgage impacts how these are structured over time.

Variable Rate Mortgages: Variable rate mortgages come in two main forms:

• Fixed Payment Variable Mortgage – You have a set monthly payment, but the portion that goes toward principal vs. interest fluctuates. When rates go up, more of your payment goes toward interest, slowing down how quickly you pay off your mortgage. When rates go down, more goes toward the principal, helping you pay off your loan faster.
• Adjustable Payment Variable Mortgage – The total mortgage payment fluctuates based on interest rate changes, ensuring the mortgage is paid off within the original amortization schedule. The portion of your payment allocated to interest and principal will shift as rates change.

Variable mortgages introduce an element of unpredictability, which some borrowers are comfortable with, while others prefer the security of knowing exactly what their payments will be.

Fixed Rate Mortgages: A fixed-rate mortgage means your interest rate and monthly payments remain the same throughout your term. This stability can be crucial for those who prioritize predictability in budgeting, mental well-being, or long-term financial planning. If the idea of fluctuating payments makes you uneasy, or if you want to avoid worrying about interest rate changes, a fixed-rate mortgage could be the right choice.

The Interest Rate Factor: The Bank of Canada (BoC) sets the overnight lending rate, which influences the Prime rate set by banks. Variable mortgage rates are typically based on Prime ± a lender-specific adjustment. There are eight key BoC announcements each year that can result in rate changes (or no changes at all). You’ve probably seen me cover these on social media (if not, I’d love for you to follow along!).

During the pandemic, the BoC lowered rates to 0.25% to stimulate borrowing. Rates began increasing in 2022 due to inflation, reaching 5% by mid-2023 before the BoC started cutting them in 2024. As of March 12, 2025, we’re at 2.75%, with six more rate decisions coming this year.

Risks: There are risks with both variable and fixed rates for your mortgage. With a fixed rate, the risk is that if rates drop, you will have a higher payment than what is available on the market. You’d also likely incur a penalty to break the fixed rate term to capitalise on any decreases. With a variable rate, the risk is that changing rates could increase the amortization of your mortgage. We also discussed the risk of Bank of Canada announcements indirectly changing your rate and therefore payment, impacting your budget and cash flow. And one final potential risk is if rates go up enough, it may trigger the need for a lump sum payment to your lender.

2025: What’s Next? The current rate is still above the target 2%, meaning there is room for potential decreases. However, nothing is guaranteed. Rates could hold steady or, in rare cases, even increase due to external factors like inflation spikes or international economic shifts.

Impact on Your Mortgage: If you have a variable mortgage, your rate is based on your lender’s Prime rate, which is influenced by the BoC policy rate. Your mortgage rate is typically Prime ± a lender adjustment. If the Prime rate is 6% and your lender offers Prime – 0.50%, your mortgage rate would be 5.50%.

• With a fixed payment variable mortgage, more of your payment goes toward principal.
• With an adjustable payment variable mortgage, your monthly payment decreases.

If you have a fixed-rate mortgage, your rate and payments remain unchanged during your term. This stability is why many borrowers prefer fixed rates, even if they sometimes come with slightly higher initial rates. Fixed rates are influenced by bond market trends rather than the Bank of Canada’s policy rate directly.

Which One is Right for You? There is no universal right answer—only the best choice for your financial situation, risk tolerance, and future plans. As your mortgage professional, I’d love to walk through your mortgage with you and discuss:

• The pros and cons of fixed vs. variable for your specific needs.
• How to budget for worst-case scenarios.
• Whether breaking your current mortgage to switch makes sense.
• Economic implications of switching between a variable and fixed rate.
• If adjustments at renewal would benefit you?

Send me an email, text, or call anytime! I’m here to provide guidance, not pressure. Let’s find the best mortgage strategy for you!

Bank of Canada Cuts Policy Rate By 25 BPs

The Bank of Canada (BoC) reduced the overnight rate by 25 basis points this morning, bringing the policy rate down to 2.75%, within the neutral range of 2.25%—2.75%. Tariff tremors have already led to a decline in consumer confidence and spending, a weakening labour market, and a decline in business investment. Compound that with falling population growth, and you see why the Governing Council took the overnight rate down again even though they state that monetary policy cannot offset the impacts of a trade war.

Trade wars lead to higher prices and slower growth. The rise in prices causes consumers to tighten their belts, concerned about the impact of tariffs on their income and investments. Today, there is a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum exports to the US. This impacts Canada the most as it supplies roughly 80% of US aluminum demand. The EU introduced retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response. Canada added to its retaliation. Recent data suggest the US economy is slowing.

Monetary policy remains restrictive as the real overnight rate (2.75% minus the headline inflation rate) is 85 bps, up from the historical average of 60 bps. Five-year Government of Canada bond yields increased on the news to 2.65% compared to 4.05% in the US. The Federal Reserve is not expected to cut rates when it meets again this month.

Despite relatively strong GDP growth in Canada in the second half of last year, home sales and hiring began to slow in late January due to tariff threats, and more tariffs are yet to come. On March 20, China is expected to impose 100% retaliatory tariffs on Canadian canola oil, while pork and seafood will face a 25% levy. The Chinese tariffs are a push-back against Canada for imposing a 100% levy on electric cars from China and  25% on steel and aluminum.

On April 2, the US announced it will impose reciprocal tariffs on nations that have levied tariffs on US goods. President Trump has also said he is considering imposing retaliatory tariffs on Canadian dairy and lumber.

“We’re now facing a new crisis. The economic impact could be severe depending on the extent and duration of new US tariffs,” Macklem said in his prepared remarks.

Macklem called the uncertainty of the tariff dispute “pervasive” and said that it was “already causing harm.” Officials said the “continuously changing” US tariff threat was hitting consumers’ spending intentions and limiting businesses’ plans to hire and invest.

At the same time, Macklem said the bank “will proceed carefully with any further changes” to borrowing costs, and officials would “need to assess both the upward pressures on inflation from higher costs and the downward pressures from weaker demand.”

Bottom Line

These are uncertain times. The US is determined to impose worldwide tariffs, disproportionately hitting Canada, Mexico, and China, the US’s top trading partners. This is a misguided neo-Mercantilist policy. Mercantilism assumes that the global economic pie is fixed, so if one country prospers, another must fail. This idea of a zero-sum game was debunked in the 18th century by Adam Smith and others who showed that if countries have a competitive advantage in various products and services, all are better off by producing and trading those products with the rest of the world. It is not a zero-sum game. The economic pie grows with trade. This was the idea behind globalization and the USMCA free trade agreement.

Given Canada’s vulnerability to tariffs, the economy will suffer more than the US, which has a relatively closed economy (where exports are a small proportion of GDP). Prices will rise depending on the duration and size of the coming tariffs, but mitigating the inflation will be the weakness in economic activity. Stagflation, a buzz-word in the 1970s, is back in the lexicon. We expect the BoC to continue cutting the policy rate in 25-bps increments until it reaches 2.25% this June, triggering a rebound in home sales. Layoffs and spending cuts will dampen sentiment, but lower interest rates will bring buyers off the sidelines.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca