Bank of Canada Holds Rates Steady As Tariff Turmoil Continues

As expected, the Bank of Canada held its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 2.75% at today’s meeting, the third consecutive rate hold since the Bank cut overnight rates seven times in the past year. The Governing Council noted that the unpredictability of the magnitude and duration of tariffs posed downside risks to growth and lifted inflation expectations, warranting caution regarding the continuation of monetary easing.

Trade negotiations between Canada and the United States are ongoing, and US trade policy remains unpredictable.

While US tariffs are disrupting trade, Canada’s economy is showing some resilience so far. Several surveys suggest consumer and business sentiment is still low, but has improved. In the labour market, we are seeing job losses in the sectors that rely on US trade, but employment is growing in other parts of the economy. The unemployment rate has moved up modestly to 6.9%.

Inflation is close to the BoC’s 2% target, but evidence of underlying inflation pressures continues. “CPI inflation has been pulled down by the elimination of the carbon tax and is just below 2%. However, a range of indicators suggests underlying inflation has increased from around 2% in the second half of last year to roughly 2½% more recently. This largely reflects an increase in prices for goods other than energy. Shelter cost inflation remains the biggest contributor to CPI inflation, but it continues to ease. Surveys indicate businesses’ inflation expectations have fallen back after rising in the first quarter, while consumers’ expectations have not come down”.

The Bank asserted today that there are reasons to think that the recent increase in underlying inflation will gradually unwind. The Canadian dollar has appreciated, which reduces import costs. Growth in unit labour costs has moderated, and the economy is in excess supply. At the same time, tariffs impose new direct costs, which will be gradually passed through to consumers. In the current tariff scenario, upside and downside pressures roughly balance out, so inflation remains close to 2%.

The central bank provided alternative scenarios for the economic outlook. In the de-escalation scenario, lower tariffs improve growth and reduce the direct cost pressures on inflation. In the escalation scenario, higher tariffs weaken the economy and increase direct cost pressures.

So far, the global economic consequences of US trade policy have been less severe than feared. US tariffs have disrupted trade in significant economies, and this is slowing global growth, but by less than many anticipated. While growth in the US economy looks to be moderating, the labour market has remained solid. And in China, lower exports to the United States have largely been replaced with stronger exports to other countries.

In Canada, we experienced robust growth in the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to firms rushing to get ahead of tariffs. In the second quarter, the economy looks to have contracted, as exports to the United States fell sharply—both as payback for the pull-forward and because tariffs are dampening US demand.

The gap between the 2.75% overnight policy rate in Canada and the 4.25-4.50% policy rate in the US is historically wide. Another cause of uncertainty is the fiscal response to today’s economic challenges. The One Big Beautiful Bill has passed, and it will add roughly US$4 trillion to the already burgeoning US federal government’s red ink. This has caused a year-to-date rise in longer-term bond yields, steepening the yield curve.

The slowdown of the housing sector since Trump’s inauguration has been a substantial drain on the economy.  The Monetary Policy Report (MPR) for July states that “growth in residential investment strengthens in the second half of 2025, partially due to an increase in resale activity after the steep decline in the first half of the year. Growth in residential investment is moderate over 2026 and 2027, supported by dissipating trade uncertainty and rising household incomes.”

Bottom Line

We expect the Canadian economy to post a small negative reading (-0.8%) in Q2 and (-0.3%) in Q3, bringing growth for the year to 1.2%. The next Governing Council decision date is September 17, which will give the  Bank time to assess the underlying momentum in inflation and the dampening effect of tariffs on economic activity.

If inflation slows over the next couple of months and the economy slows in Q2 and Q3 as widely expected, the Bank will likely cut rates one more time this year, bringing the overnight rate down to 2.50%, within the neutral range for monetary policy. Bay Street economists have varying views on the rate outlook (see chart above). While the Fed will hold rates steady today, despite the incredible pressure coming from the White House, the Bank of Canada could well cut rates one more time this year.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca

You found a better rate. Maybe you’re moving. Or consolidating debt. On the surface, breaking your mortgage might look like a smart move. But before you pull the trigger, take a closer look at the penalty. In many cases, it can eat up most of the savings or potentially worse.

This guide explains how prepayment penalties work, why they differ between lenders, and how to know whether refinancing early is actually worth it.

What Is a Prepayment Penalty?

A prepayment penalty is the cost your lender charges if you end your mortgage term early. It’s their way of recovering lost interest.

In Canada, the penalty is usually whichever is higher:

1. Three months’ interest
2. The Interest Rate Differential (IRD)

If you have a variable-rate mortgage, you’ll typically be charged three months of interest. If you have a fixed-rate mortgage, lenders often apply the IRD, which is usually higher.

How Three Months’ Interest Works

This is the simpler of the two. You multiply your mortgage balance by your interest rate, divide by 12, and then multiply by 3.

Example:

• Mortgage balance: $400,000
• Interest rate: 4.50%

($400,000 × 4.50%) ÷ 12 × 3 = $4,500 penalty

This formula applies to most variable-rate mortgages and some fixed-rate mortgages if the IRD ends up lower.

Understanding the Interest Rate Differential (IRD)

The IRD is the more complex and potentially more expensive penalty.

There are variations to how individual lenders calculate IRD. Here’s a simple example to illustrate the concept:The IRD formula measures how much more interest you’re paying compared to what the lender could earn by lending that money today. The larger the difference between your current rate and today’s posted rate for the remaining term, the bigger the penalty.

Example:

• Balance: $400,000
• Fixed rate: 4.80%
• Time left: 2 years
• Lender’s current 2-year posted rate: 3.00%

(4.80% – 3.00%) × 2 years × $400,000 = $14,400 penalty

That’s more than triple the cost of the three-month interest formula.

Why Penalties Vary So Much

The biggest reason for the variation is how lenders calculate IRD. Some banks use their inflated posted rates in the formula, which increases the penalty. Others, like many monoline lenders (non-bank lenders who work with mortgage brokers), use discounted rates that better reflect the market.

As a result, two homeowners with similar mortgages can face very different costs, depending on which lender they chose.

When Breaking Your Mortgage Makes Sense

Let’s say you want to refinance to a lower rate. Here’s how to do the math.

Scenario:

• Balance: $400,000
• Current rate: 4.80%
• Remaining term: 3 years
• Available new rate: 3.50%
• Penalty: $12,000
• Interest savings at new rate: $16,200 over 3 years

In this case, you come out ahead by $4,200 after covering the penalty.

But if the numbers were reversed…say the penalty was $16,200 and the savings only $12,000, you’d be locking in a loss.

How to Lower the Penalty or Avoid It

There are ways to reduce the impact of a prepayment charge:

Ask for details upfront Before signing a mortgage, ask how the lender calculates penalties. Make sure you understand the math.

Choose lenders carefully Monoline lenders often use fairer IRD formulas than the big banks.

Consider variable rates They usually come with smaller penalties, just three months’ interest.

Explore blend-and-extend options Some lenders will let you blend your current rate with a new one and avoid breaking the mortgage entirely.

Use your porting option If you’re moving homes, some lenders allow you to transfer your mortgage to a new property without a penalty.

Time your break strategically As your maturity date gets closer, the IRD penalty often shrinks. Waiting a few months can make a big difference.

The Bottom Line

A lower rate or better opportunity can be tempting. But breaking your mortgage isn’t always a financial win. The penalty can erase much of the benefit if you’re not careful.

Before making a decision, calculate both the penalty and the long-term savings. If you’re not sure, don’t hesitate to book a Discovery Call with me today! I can run the numbers and help you choose the best path forward.

Canada’s Economy Shows Amazing Resilience in June

The Canadian economy refuses to buckle under the weight of tariff uncertainty and further potential tariff hikes. The Labour Force Survey, released this morning for June, showed a surprising net new job gain of 83,100 positions, the most significant number of jobs this year. A whopping 84% of the employment gain was in part-time work.

June marked the first time in five months when the economy created enough jobs to keep unemployment from rising, after months of tepid gains and losses. At the same time, Canada added a net of 143,800 jobs over the last six months, the slowest first-half year pace since 2018, excluding the pandemic, with a monthly average of 24,000 job gains.

The central bank has held interest rates at 2.75% for the past two meetings, and its path ahead will depend mainly on how the economy and inflation adapt to tariffs and trade uncertainty. While the economy is expected to slow in the second quarter, firm inflation remains a concern for policymakers, who will set rates again on July 30.

Traders in overnight swaps trimmed expectations of easing at that meeting, putting the odds of a quarter percentage point cut at about 15%, from 30% before the release.

The employment rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 years and older who are employed—increased by 0.1 percentage points to 60.9% in June. The employment rate had previously recorded a cumulative decline of 0.3 percentage points in March and April and had held steady in May.The number of employees increased in both the private (+47,000; +0.3%) and public (+23,000; +0.5%) sectors in June, while the number of self-employed workers was little changed.

The unemployment rate increased 0.1 percentage points to 7.0% in May, the highest rate since September 2016 (excluding 2020 and 2021, during the pandemic). The uptick in May was the third consecutive monthly increase; since February, the unemployment rate has risen by 0.4 percentage points.

There were 1.6 million unemployed people in May, an increase of 13.8% (+191,000) from 12 months earlier. A smaller share of people who were unemployed in April transitioned into employment in May (22.6%), compared with one year earlier (24.0%) and compared with the pre-pandemic average for the same months in 2017, 2018 and 2019 (31.5%) (not seasonally adjusted). This indicates that people face greater difficulties finding work in the current labour market.

The average duration of unemployment has also been rising; unemployed people had spent an average of 21.8 weeks searching for work in May, up from 18.4 weeks in May 2024. Furthermore, nearly half (46.5%) of people unemployed in May 2025 had not worked in the previous 12 months or had never worked, up from 40.7% in May 2024 (not seasonally adjusted).

The layoff rate—representing the proportion of people who were employed in April but became unemployed in May as a result of a layoff—was 0.6%, unchanged from May 2024 (not seasonally adjusted).

The unemployment rate fell 0.1 percentage points to 6.9% in June, the first decrease since January. Before this decline, the unemployment rate had increased for three consecutive months ending in May 2025, reaching its highest level (7.0%) since September 2016 (excluding 2020 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic).

In June, the unemployment rate among core-aged women fell 0.3 percentage points to 5.4%. Among core-aged men, it was little changed at 6.1%, as the number of job searchers held steady despite the employment gains.

Notably, age 25-54 employment rose 90,600 (which is the most significant increase on record, excluding the 2020-2022 pandemic distortion), lowering their jobless rate to 5.8%, reversing May’s increase.

There were 1.6 million unemployed people in June, little changed in the month but up 128,000 (+9.0%) on a year-over-year basis.

Compared with one year earlier, long-term unemployment was up in June 2025. Over one in five unemployed people (21.8%) had been searching for work for 27 weeks or more in June, an increase from 17.7% in June 2024.

More people are employed in wholesale and retail trade, health care, and social assistance.

Employment in wholesale and retail trade increased by 34,000 (+1.1%) in June, the second consecutive monthly gain. The increase in June was concentrated in retail trade (+38,000; +1.7%). On a year-over-year basis, employment in wholesale and retail trade was up by 84,000 (+2.9%).

Employment change by industry, June 2025

Employment also rose in health care and social assistance (+17,000; +0.6%) in June, the first notable change since December 2024. Compared with 12 months earlier, employment in the industry grew by 78,000 (+2.8%) in June 2025.

Agriculture was the only industry with a notable employment decline (-6,000; -2.6%) in June. On a year-over-year basis, employment in agriculture was little changed. Amazingly, the manufacturing sector showed a considerable job gain in June, rising 10,500, breaking a four-month losing streak. GDP may bounce back in June, but Q2 is still tracking negative, suggesting productivity was much softer, too.

Regionally, Alberta, Ontario and Quebec accounted for the bulk of job gains, while Atlantic Canada was a soft spot. Ontario’s jobless rate slipped a tick to 7.8%, still well above the national average and the highest among the larger provinces. That comes in sharp contrast to B.C., where a significant decline in the labour force pulled the unemployment rate down 0.8 ppts to 5.6%, third lowest in the country behind Saskatchewan (4.9%) and Manitoba (5.5%).

Hours worked were solid as well,  up 0.5% m/m in June, leaving them up 1.3% annualized for the quarter.

Bottom Line

Wage inflation also continues to decelerate, providing some relief for the Bank of Canada. However, with the labour market showing some resilience, the odds of an overnight rate cut in July are minimal.

In other news, Trump Threatens 35% Tariff on Some Canadian Goods: The U.S. will put a 35% tariff on imports from Canada effective Aug. 1, President Trump announced on Thursday evening. But an exemption for goods that comply with the nations’ free-trade agreement, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, would still apply, accounting for just over 90% of Canadian-US trade. A White House official said, stressing that it could change. WSJ

Barring a sharp decline in next week’s CPI data for June, which is unlikely, the strength in today’s jobs report and the recently heightened uncertainty on the trade front likely keep the BoC on the sidelines when it meets late this month.

Dr. Sherry Cooper
Chief Economist, Dominion Lending Centres
drsherrycooper@dominionlending.ca