Back to Blog

Why I’m Rooting for the 50-Year Mortgage (Even if it doesn’t exist yet)

General Kimberly Coutts 3 Feb

I just returned from a mortgage conference with some of the best in the industry, and while most people were talking about whether we’d see another rate reduction by the Bank of Canada or stay the course (including me), we had experts share a “thought experiment” that could change the game for an entire generation: The 50-year amortization.

I know what you’re thinking: “That’s way too much interest!” But let’s look at the reality of the Canadian market in 2026.

The Barrier to Entry is a Wall The average first-time homebuyer is now 40 years old. In our major cities, nearly 7 out of 10 buyers require a “gift” from their parents to even qualify—often to the tune of $100k to $300k. homeownership is becoming a “members only” club for those with generational wealth.

Rent is 100% Interest The biggest objection to a 50-year mortgage is the interest cost over time. But we rarely apply that same logic to the rental market. If you rent for 50 years, you have paid 100% interest and own 0% of the asset.

A 50-year mortgage isn’t a life sentence; it’s an on-ramp. It provides the lowest possible monthly payment during the years when life is most expensive—when you’re starting a career or raising a young family.

The Forced Savings Advantage We are living in a “K-shaped” economy. Homeowners are statistically 6 to 7 times wealthier than renters because a mortgage is a forced savings vehicle.

  • Equity as a Safety Net: Homeowners can tap into equity to consolidate high-interest debt. Renters are stuck with high-cost credit cards and no leverage.
  • Tax Efficiency: The principal residence exemption remains the best tax-free wealth builder in Canada.

A New Tool for a New Reality Back in the 80s, our parents dealt with 18% interest rates, but their homes cost 3x their annual salary. Today, homes are 10x our salary. The old rules don’t work for the new reality.

A 50-year amortization would allow young professionals to get into the market at 25 instead of 45. They could make lump-sum payments as their income grows, increase their frequency, or re-amortize at renewal.

The goal isn’t to stay in debt forever—it’s to get in the door. Because you can’t build a legacy on a rental receipt.

What’s your take? Is it time we stop letting “optics” get in the way of access? I’d love to hear your thoughts.